Wendy Auger, a resident of Rochester, New Hampshire, finds herself embroiled in a dispute with state authorities over her beloved vanity license plate, which proudly bears the inscription “PB4WEGO.” For fifteen years, this license plate has brought joy to Auger and countless other motorists. However, the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has deemed it “inappropriate” due to the inclusion of the letters “P” and “B,” which can be interpreted as part of a word considered offensive.

As a seasoned bartender, Auger has vocally opposed the Department of Motor Vehicles’ decision, viewing it as an encroachment on her freedom of speech. She argues that the message, “pe* before we go,” is simply a common-sense piece of advice and not something that could reasonably be deemed offensive.

Auger’s attachment to her license plate has deepened over time, especially after New Hampshire expanded the character limit on vanity plates from six to seven, making her plate even more unique. However, the state maintains that these modifications were implemented in compliance with a court ruling issued years ago, citing specific regulations as justification.

Auger’s predicament has sparked a broader conversation about the delicate balance between individual expression and government regulation. After proudly displaying her cherished plate for fifteen years, many question whether she should be compelled to relinquish it.

Despite Auger’s protests, the Department of Motor Vehicles has stood firm in its decision, citing legal mandates as justification. Auger perceives this as a violation of her rights and privacy, feeling unfairly targeted by the state’s actions.

This case underscores the complexities surrounding freedom of expression and the extent to which government institutions can curtail it. Auger’s ongoing struggle to retain her personalized license plate serves as a poignant reminder of the tension between individual liberty and governmental control in contemporary society.